> which I hope is still a good link to that very good workstation GPU review. You can see that the performance of workstation cards is so much oriented towards 3D CAD use that in some cases, a $180 Firepro is faster than a $1,000 GTX Titan: I tried one of these with my Quadro FX 4800 and it would produc x128 anti-aliasing.
#Amd firepro w4100 driver solidworks drivers#
There are special drivers produced by Dessault for Solidworks use. Quadros are good for Solidworks becuase it is CUDA accelerated- as are many Autodesk and Adobe programs:
Yes, for 3D CAD modeling in Solidworks, a Xeon > EEC > Quadro is the best specification. From the budget being mentioned in Euros, I thought you were in Northern EU, Norway or somewhere! We could communicate in german (or french/dutch/spanish for that matter). If you want we can also have private contact since I have the feeling you're german. You only mention Nvidia cards is there a reason to ommit the Firepro series? Something like a W4100 would enter nicely into my budget.Īs for the RAM I'll go with 16GB for now (2x8 DIMMs) and keep the possibility to add 16GB later. Regarding the GPU: I agree, and after having researched a little better yesterday I decided to go with a workstatoin card. I see it has more cache, are there other obvious differences? I am doing my geometry homework right now so I'm not able to explore the depths of Google right now. Why not the Xeon E3 1230 v3? The Xeon W3690 is the only one that would fall into my budget at the moment. Another option would be to check in Chile / Uruguay to see if I can buy a complete workstation there. I can order through (through direct relatives), my problem is that I am living in Argentina which has a very closed market, that's why I am looking for parts, to separately get them here and build the PC. My attitude towards workstation system is to imagine the expected performance working on the largest project on the most demanding program.
0 kommentar(er)
